How Long Does it Take to Make a Documentary?

How Long Does it Take to Make a Documentary? image 0

When you are making a documentary, the key is to have a comprehensive plan of how the film will be shot. Then, you need to hire a professional editor to oversee the edit. A professional editor can spend several weeks offline editing before picture lock, or postproduction. Four weeks is typical for a 30-minute documentary film, eight weeks for a one-hour film, and twelve weeks for a 90-minute feature documentary. Of course, longer films will require more time offline. In addition, you must allow for stakeholder viewing and approval of rough cuts.

Interviewing relevant people for a documentary

There are several steps to interviewing relevant people for your documentary film. The first step is to decide on the concept of the film. Once you have this in mind, you can begin planning the interview questions. Then, you should make a list of the relevant people who would be suitable for the interview. After you have a list of people, plan where you want to interview each one and how you will ask their answers. It will be helpful if you have a draft of the interview questions.

If you need to use a person, be sure to get a release form from them. Make sure that they are comfortable with the camera. You can use a wireless microphone to ensure that you can hear the subject. Also, do not start the camera right away. Get used to the subject and prepare answers before the interview. A good interview can take a few tries, so you have to be patient.

Before conducting interviews, prepare questions that will focus on the subject of your documentary film. Remember that a lot of interviewers ask too many questions in an attempt to appear knowledgeable. Keep in mind that most documentary films cover the basics of the topic. A good question should be focused on the subject, but still allow room for pauses. Remember that your interviewee may be trying to remember something and might need a few minutes to think about it.

It is important to listen attentively to the answers you get during an interview. Pay attention to the tone of voice and body language of your interviewees. The key to a successful documentary film interview is to be prepared, listen carefully, and keep the conversation flowing naturally. This way, you can make your documentary film as interesting as possible. After all, you need to get the best possible answers for your audience!

Creating a detailed plan for filming

Before filming, create a detailed plan for filming your documentary. Using a camera with a video head or a gimbal can make shots more stable and smooth. Also, determine the types of shots you’ll need. If you plan to use highly detailed footage, you may need to use high resolution cameras and different lens focal lengths. Also, make sure to include establishing shots, as they are crucial for setting context and avoiding confusion about the timeline of your story.

Before filming, you need to do extensive research on your topic. Watch existing films and research library materials. You can also speak with people who are familiar with the topic to gather stories for the film. The more you know, the better. If you don’t know a lot about a subject, try to find a book about it. A book about the subject matter will make your documentary better, and you’ll learn more about it.

You can create a timeline by ranking the elements of your documentary in terms of their importance. Arrange the shooting sequence around the elements that are most crucial to your documentary. Whether you’re shooting a natural history documentary or a fictional story, you’ll need to determine who your documentary crew will include. A lighting technician, cameraman, sound specialist, editor, marketing agent, and marketer are all possible elements of a production crew. Depending on the nature of your documentary, you’ll also need to hire a full production crew to help you film. They’ll also be able to help you with equipment rentals.

After creating the plan for your documentary, you’ll need to identify the subjects and characters. You’ll also need to determine how many days of filming you need. This is a critical component of planning. Without a plan, you’ll end up with a finished documentary with a lackluster storyline. So make sure you spend the time necessary to brainstorm. In addition to researching the topic and determining the cast, you can discuss the project with others.

Organizing footage for a documentary

Organizing footage for a documentary film requires a lot of organization. A good way to organize your footage is to use bins, which you can create by location, scene, interviewee, and B-Roll. A universal bin structure is also useful for reality shows. As a documentary filmmaker, you must know how to manage your assets to avoid losing any of them. Listed below are some tips for storing and organizing your footage.

How Long Does it Take to Make a Documentary? image 0
How Long Does it Take to Make a Documentary? image 1

Using a computer is an ideal way to organize film footage. You can use video editing software, such as Kyno, to organize your files. Once you’ve finished editing your film, you can export it as an Excel document, allowing you to find any video footage easily. It’s also easy to browse video footage from your computer. It’s a good idea to create a backup of any footage before you start shooting.

Once you’ve compiled all your footage, organize it into groups. Sorting by topic can help you focus on the most important shots, such as interviews or vignettes. Next, categorize the video clips by their types. For example, if a film is about a family, you may want to include a lot of talking heads. In some cases, B-roll and supplementary photos can help you balance dialogue and talking heads.

Documentary films often have unpredictable stories and budgets. Extra shooting days can be added to the schedule, while the post-production period may stretch longer than expected. Sometimes new evidence emerges and you need to reshoot an interview. In other words, the documentary filmmaker must adjust for the shifting evidence. If you want to be successful, it is essential to organize the footage well. So, if you want your film to be a success, make sure it has a marketing plan to get the word out about it.

Using B-roll to mask flaws in interviews

If you want to avoid showing your interviewee’s shaky hands, you can use b-roll footage over the interview. B-roll footage can be recorded from the same angles as the a-roll footage. You can even mix handheld footage with wide angle shots. This technique is often used for TV commercials, but it can be effective for other types of video as well.

Besides allowing for visual interest, B-roll can also help you mask distracting shots, such as out-of-focus footage. This type of footage can be used to hide verbose answers, pauses, errs, coughs, and other problems. The key is to obtain a wide range of B-roll clips. Here are some examples of B-roll footage and their use in interviews:

When using B-roll to mask flaws in an interview, use as much of it as possible. Often, it can help fill in the gaps in an interview or video. B-roll footage can also be used in post-production to tighten an edit and make the video more interesting. But it’s not always necessary to use B-roll to mask flaws in interviews. You can use it to cover up mistakes and enhance the overall quality of the interview.

Creating a detailed plan for editing a documentary

Before beginning the process of filming your documentary, create a detailed plan of your shooting schedule. This plan will outline all the information you will need to make your documentary as smooth as possible. Consider what kind of viewer you are trying to reach with your film. If you are trying to get the most out of a film, a high-resolution camera and different lenses can be helpful. Establishing shots are also necessary, as they set the context for the scenes. Having a detailed plan for your film will make the entire process run smoothly, and will prevent you from spending too much time editing.

After creating a detailed plan for your documentary, decide what you want to include in your film. If you are trying to convey a message through a personal story, interviews are a great way to do that. You can also capture real-world footage or existing materials. If you’re making a historical documentary, re-creations of the events will help show how important figures felt during the time of the event. Once you have your film’s storyboard in place, you can start shooting.

This article will discuss some popular examples of factually correct documentaries. These films range from «Our Planet» to «Voyeur» and include works by Boleslaw Matuszewski and Alberto Cavalcanti. We’ll also discuss Man on the Moon and Jacques Cousteau’s The Unknown. In general, documentaries in this genre are avant-garde, and they usually feature people as products of their surroundings.

Our Planet

If you’re a nature lover, you’ve likely wondered whether the Our Planet documentaries are factually accurate. These Netflix series are produced by Alastair Fothergill. They are the culmination of a four-year collaboration between Silverback Films and the World Wildlife Federation. These programs lean heavily on conservationist themes. In fact, the film teaches us that we can’t ignore human presence in our natural habitats.

How Long Does it Take to Make a Documentary? image 1
How Long Does it Take to Make a Documentary? image 2

The fact-checked content of the Our Planet documentaries is a good example. The show’s writers are committed to being factual without sugarcoating. However, it’s hard for Attenborough to get through five minutes of animal antics without groaning or grumbling. This is a testament to the film’s auteurship. Regardless of the resulting effect, viewers can expect to feel inspired to act in ways that help the environment.

One of the most impressive aspects of the Our Planet series is its exploration of climate change. While the majority of us know about the catastrophic consequences of climate change, we don’t want the show to paint this picture as one that is unfavorable. Instead, it shows how much the effects of climate change are already starting to manifest themselves. For instance, in Australia, one heat wave killed 11,000 fruit bats. The series also examines extreme weather events, such as floods and superstorms, and the displacement of communities due to rising sea levels.


If you have ever seen a reality show or watched other kinds of media, you have probably heard of the term voyeur. However, this term is a bit different than the historical usage. Voyeurism was invented in the 1850s by well-paid hole-lookers working in brothels. Though the practice was commercially viable at the time, it did not gain formal medical recognition until the 1880s. Nowadays, society has come to accept the term voyeur to describe people who watch others’ intimate lives, including those on reality television.

In a recent interview on the Neal Conan Show, voyeur Gerald Foos talked about his experiences as a Peeping Tom. He also discussed his own experiences as a victim. He also explained how voyeurs can use secret peep-holes to sneak up on people. Voyeurs are considered paraphiliacs, but they do not engage in sexual acts with humans.

Une nouvelle source de l’histoire by Boleslaw Matuszewski

A New Source of History by Boleslaw Matuszewski was published in 1917, but the book’s significance is largely obscured by its title. It was the first book to analyze cinema as a means of recording history, and is widely considered the first theoretical text about cinema. In this book, Matuszewski suggests the creation of a cinematographic museum, depository, library, and archive vault.

This opuscule consists of twelve pages, but it is an early attempt at establishing a public archive for film. The cinematographe des fréres Lumière, which dated from 1890, was only three years old at the time, and the chronophotographe of Etienne-Jules Marey, published in 1889, were both filmed by Matuszewski.

In his book, Une Nouvelle Source of History, Boleslaw Matuszewski proposes the creation of a film archive. He also advocates for a periodical dedicated to the history of cinema that will include films that were created after the First World War. Matuszewski’s dream would be to see these documents preserved as official historical archives in the National Library of France, Bibliotheque Nationale, Archives, Museum of French History, and Musée de France.

Man on the Moon

While the film «Man on the Moon» has sparked popular imaginations, it is not factually accurate. While it looks like a man or a rabbit, the dark splotches are scars left by giant space rocks that passed through billions of years ago. In fact, the right eye of the fabled «man on the moon» was made by one of these rocks.

In addition to Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin, the film also features the first three men who set foot on the Moon. On July 16, 1969, Apollo 11 launched from Cape Kennedy. Neil Armstrong was the commander, while Michael Collins manned the Command Module. Both astronauts were safe and returned to Earth. Although the film is a masterpiece, some details aren’t quite right. So, what is factually correct?

In addition to the moon landing, Buzz Aldrin (the second man to walk on the moon) embarked on three spacewalks during his Gemini 12 spaceflight. These five-and-a-half hour spacewalks were reportedly not real, but Aldrin also pioneered underwater training methods to simulate spacewalking and prepare astronauts for the weightlessness of space. In this way, the movie can’t be considered «fiction.»

How Long Does it Take to Make a Documentary? image 2
How Long Does it Take to Make a Documentary? image 3


While Grierson helped codify documentary film practice, he was far from radical. The legacy of his liberal filmmaking has often obscured the voices of radical critics. Bill Nichols argues that interwar European documentaries have been suppressed, and Brian Winston advocates distancing documentary practice from Grierson. Winston argues that radical politics in documentary is a form of deviancy.

Although Grierson was a self-confessed propagandist of the British Empire, his document has been proven to be factually incorrect by multiple independent sources. Critics who criticize his film have found the documentarists to be highly partisan, and their criticisms of the British Empire are based on their own political analysis. Grierson’s docs were largely accurate, but they have been criticized for not being factually correct.

The filmmaking process itself is inherently problematic. John Grierson and his colleagues argued that the films produced by the Film Board of Canada were legitimate counter-propaganda to the Nazi propaganda orchestrated by Joseph Goebbels. Grierson’s films were also the first in the United States and other Western countries to adopt a modern newsreel format. This transition paved the way for television documentaries.

Riefenstahl’s film

It has long been debated whether Leni Riefenstahl’s documentary film, «Olympia,» is factually accurate. While many people have praised Riefenstahl, others are sceptical. There are some instances of factual errors, and some viewers will probably feel more comfortable ignoring them. The following is a list of the most frequently cited inaccuracies.

Victory of Faith is an uncultivated template for Riefenstahl’s scandalous 1935 film. Riefenstahl’s film is a vivid portrayal of the Sixth National Socialist Party rally. This event, in fact, happened in 1933. The film shows people marching through the parade ground, and captures their faces vividly. This is a testament to Riefenstahl’s sense of scope and dynamism. The film stresses the stunning architecture of the ancient German city, and depicts the uniformed marching units and bright-eyed Hitler youth.

Triumph of the Will was a massive production. The film included numerous assistants, aerial and still photographers, lighting crew, and security. The crew and cameramen were all uniformed, but Riefenstahl wore a white trench coat that was immediately distinguishable. Wieland notes this as a key feature of the film. The fact that Riefenstahl was a woman, however, is another issue.

Farocki’s film

The title of Farocki’s film, Der Ausdruck der Hande, suggests the idea that the cinema is the repository for forgotten languages of the body, allowing it to provide new tools for research into the body’s physiology and development. Its predecessor, an appeal for funding for a national image library, derived from Farocki’s 1975 «Bilderschatz» project, sought to preserve images for future research. The library was assembled from video production workshops around the world.

But this is not the whole story. Farocki’s film reveals his political commitment, making it factually correct despite the distorted reality. Farocki had a long, prolific career and a great deal of skin in the game. He believed in the power of images and a critical stance on film culture. His total practice incorporated many vital elements and may be more important than his films. In recent years, he has shown his video installation work in galleries, avoiding the problematic selection processes of film festivals.

The German documentary filmmaker Farocki changed his last name to avoid controversy by misrepresenting his ethnicity and nationality. His family immigrated from Nazi-occupied Sudetenland in the late 1940s and lived in India and Indonesia before returning to Germany in 1958. During this time, Farocki’s parents moved to Hamburg, Germany and his father’s birthplace, West Java. Farocki left home in 1962 to attend the Free University in West Berlin.

Matuszewski’s film

Boleslaw Matuszewski is credited with being the father of depository law. The French depository law was adopted in 1977, and the United States federal legislation is just a few years old. Yet in many countries, depository law is considered revolutionary. Matuszewski’s film is factually correct and demonstrates how cinematography can contribute to preserving our nation’s history.

How Long Does it Take to Make a Documentary? image 3

The film was a landmark for Matuszewski, who had argued in public that movies embody values. His proposal, therefore, included a motion picture archive that would provide public access to its holdings, through open projections. Matuszewski’s film is a remarkably accurate, if controversial, portrait of Poland’s modern history. It is also factually correct, and Matuszewski’s film demonstrates his own commitment to preserving the past.

Like this post? Please share to your friends:

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/nj455554/ on line 406

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/nj455554/ on line 436
Leave a Reply

;-) :| :x :twisted: :smile: :shock: :sad: :roll: :razz: :oops: :o :mrgreen: :lol: :idea: :grin: :evil: :cry: :cool: :arrow: :???: :?: :!: